| |
Bibliography regarding the effects
of recreation on natural resources
and habitats of open-space lands
The purpose of this bibliography is to share information with decision
makers and other interested persons regarding human impacts, primarily
from recreation, on wildlife and their habitats of Front Range open spaces.
By providing summaries of impartial, peer-reviewed scientific studies
and interpretations, the intent of this document is to help guide decisions
and directions, which are commonly passed down from elected officials
to open-space departments in our communities. The articles are annotated
with an italicized summary, in which quotations marks enclose passages
taken verbatim from that article. A few review articles are also listed.
The intended audience includes elected officials (e.g., Boulder City
Council members, Boulder County Commissioners), appointed boards that
provide advice on open-space issues and policies, and other government
officials, such as the Boulder City Manager. This document will be given
to such individuals. It will be updated periodically by scientists affiliated
with Friends of Boulder Open Space (FOBOS), which provides this text
and digital files of the articles and (or) abstracts on the FOBOS website.
The scientific articles listed here represent only a small fraction
of articles available on recreational impacts. We do not wish to overwhelm
readers with a long document but instead to present some relevant and,
where possible, recent results. All articles have long lists of cited
publications that can be consulted for earlier studies. Moreover, the
naturalists and ecologists on open-space staffs are familiar with these
articles and many others. With this compilation, we do not intend to
supplant a critical function of these experts in communicating ecological
science to their managers and communities. Instead, we would like simply
to facilitate the retrieval of relevant literature, so that all interested
parties can quickly be “on the same page” when it comes to accessing
scientific knowledge bearing on management of our landscapes and natural
resources in the face of increasing recreational uses and more trails.
The City Open Space and Mountain Parks Department has now made available
online copies of the many studies it has funded to look at different
aspects of the system. This is an excellent portal to be able to review
years of research that has been done respecting the city’s open space
and mountain park lands.
Boulder County Parks and Open Space has also made many of its research
studies available on line. An Excel spreadsheet with the links can be
found here. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
1.
Effects of dogs on wildlife |
 |
Banks, P.B. and Bryant, J.V., 2007, Four-legged friend or foe? Dog
walking displaces native birds from natural areas: Biology Letters.
Doi10.1098/rsbl2007.0374.
The presence of humans without dogs caused
significant declines in diversity and abundance of birds, but the
impacts of dogs, even restrained on-leash, resulted in greater displacement
of birds and more severely diminished local bird fauna. Considering
a zone within 50 meters (about 150 feet) of the trail as the zone
of influence by dogs (all on-leash), observations indicated that
“dog walking in woodland leads to a 35% reduction in bird diversity
and 41% reduction in abundance. These results argue against access
by dog walkers to sensitive conservation areas.” “Local wildlife
does not become habituated to continued disturbance by dogs.” |
| |
|
 |
Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L., Miller, C.K., 2001, Wildlife responses
to pedestrians and dogs: Wildlife Society Bulletin v. 29 (1), p. 124-132.
Three
treatments, consisting of solitary pedestrians, a pedestrian accompanied
by a dog on-leash, and a dog alone (all treatments both on- and off-trail),
were used to study effects on mule deer and three songbird species.
Wildlife responses varied near trails. All four species were negatively
affected by off-trail users. |
| |
|
 |
Miller, J.A., and Hobbs, N.T., 2000, Recreational trails, human activity,
and nest predation in lowland riparian areas: Landscape and Urban Planning,
v. 50 (4), p. 227-236
At four lowland riparian sites in eastern Boulder
County, clay eggs were used to simulate bird nests to study predation
rates at varying proximity to recreational trails. Birds attacked
more nests near trails than away from trails, but native predatory
mammals (e.g., mice and squirrels) appeared to avoid nests near trails
to some extent. “These results support the contention that recreational
trails and human activity may affect nesting success for some species.” |
| |
|
| |
Lowry, D.A. and McArthur, K.L., 1978, Domestic dogs as predators
on deer: Wildlife Society Bulletin, V. 6 (1), p. 38-39.
Written by
an employee of the Idaho Fish and Game Department, this short article
describes harassment and predation by dogs that resulted in direct
and indirect mortality of deer in northern Idaho where residences
are interspersed throughout deer winter range. |
| |
|
| |
2. Effects
of recreational trails on habitats/wildlife |
 |
Sarah E. Reed & Adina M. Merenlender, Quiet,
Nonconsumptive Recreation Reduces Protected Area Effectiveness
Protected areas around the world were created with the goals of
preserving biodiversity and providing nature-based recreation opportunities
for millions of people. This dual mandate guides the management of
the majority of the world’s protected areas, but there is growing
evidence that quiet, nonconsumptive recreation may not be compatible
with biodiversity protection. We combined noninvasive survey techniques
and DNA verification of species identifications to survey for mammalian
carnivores in 28 parks and preserves in northern California. Paired
comparisons of neighboring protected areas with and without recreation
revealed that the presence of dispersed, nonmotorized recreation
led to a five-fold decline in the density of native carnivores and
a substantial shift in community composition from native to nonnative
species. Demand for recreation and nature-based tourism is forecasted
to grow dramatically around the world, and our findings suggest a
pressing need for new approaches to the designation and management
of protected areas. |
| |
|
 |
Miller, S.G., Knight, R.L., Miller, C.K., 1998, Influence
of recreational trails on breeding bird communities: Ecological Applications
8 (1), p. 162-169.
Bird species diversity, composition, and abundance
were assessed in proximity to recreational trails on City of Boulder
open space in 1994-95. In both grassland and forest ecosystems, areas
with increasing distance from trails harbored more species, more
individuals, and higher nest survival of young birds, for many important
bird species. A nest predator (magpie) fared better closer to trails. |
| |
|
| |
Blumstein, D.T. Fernandez,-Juricic, E., Zollner, P.A.,
and Garrity, S.C., 2005, Inter-specific variation in avian responses
to human disturbance: Journal of Applied Ecology, v. 42, p. 943-953.
(doi:10.1111/j.1365-2665.2005.01071).
Transient human activity disturbs
birds, leading to declines in species numbers. |
| |
|
| |
Stenhouse, R., 2004, Fragmentation and internal disturbance
of natural vegetation reserves in the Perth metropolitan area, Western
Australia: Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 68 (4), p. 389-401.
A close
association was found among recreational path density, high levels
of fragmentation, weed infestation, and low vegetation condition. |
| |
|
| |
3. Effects
of horses on soil stability and erosion |
| |
Deluca, T.H., Patterson, W.A., Friemund, W.A., Cole,
D.N., 1998, Influence of llamas, horses, and hikers on soil erosion
from established recreation trials in western Montana, USA: Environmental
Management, v. 22 (2), p. 255-262.
Horses turn up more soil than hikers
leading to more sediment yield and thus creating more erosion. |
| |
|
| |
Cole, D.N. and Spildie, D.R., 1998, Hiker, horse, and
llama trampling effects on native vegetation in Montana, USA: Journal
of Environmental Management, v. 53, p. 61-71.
Horses, more than hikers,
expose soil and have greater impact on relative cover of resident
vegetation. The study area included two types of forest vegetation. |
| |
|
| |
4. Effects
of horses on spread of weeds |
| |
Wells, F. and Lauenroth, W.K., 2007, The potential
for horses to disperse alien plants along recreational trails: Rangeland
Ecology and Management, v. 60 (6), p. 574-577.
Because it is common
for horses to graze in “weedy” pastures and because their feed may
be contaminated by alien plants, horses may be an important cause
of introducing invasive plant species far into previously non-invaded
wildlands. In this study, seedlings were grown from samples of horse
dung collected along a recreational trail in the White River National
Forest (Colorado). In replicate plantings, 85% of seedlings were
alien species. “Our results make clear that horses used on recreational
trails represent a potentially important dispersal vector for alien
plants in western wildlands.” |
| |
|
| |
5. Effects
of dogs on spread of weeds |
| |
Sime, C.A., 1999, Domestic dogs in wildlife habitats
effects of recreation on rocky mountain wildlife. A Review for Montana. Montana Chapter
of The Wildlife Society.
A Wildlife
Biologist for the Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (Kalispell) writes,
“domestic dogs do pick up and transport seeds in their hair and paws.
While the scale of noxious weed seed transport by dogs is small compared
to that of motorized vehicles, dogs can travel and deposit seeds
in locations far removed from roads and trail systems. Because these
areas are not traveled as frequently as roads, emerging weed plants
may go undetected and not be treated in a timely manner.” |
| |
|
| |
6. Effects
of other or general disturbances on the spread on non-native plant
species |
| |
Note: Trails, especially those created by gouging or
tilling or in any way moving or removing soil, represent one of the
most common and widespread disturbances on open-space land. There are
numerous examples of noxious weed invasion along the edges of open-space
trails. |
| |
|
| |
Bradford, J.B. and Lauenroth, W.K., 2006, Controls over
invasion of Bromus tectorum: The importance of climate, soil, disturbance,
and seed availability: Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 17, p. 693-704.
Frequent soil disturbance causes more cheatgrass in invaded areas,
and higher seed availability causes faster invasion. Disturbance
and cheatgrass invasion are connected primarily by the ways in which
disturbed soils acquire and utilize water. |
| |
|
| |
Knick, S.T. and Rotenberry, J.T., 1997, Landscape characteristic
of disturbed shrubsteppe habitats in southwestern Idaho (USA): Landscape
Ecology 12, 287-297.
There is a strong connection between disturbance
of grassland and shrubland and the invasion of cheatgrass. |
| |
|
| |
Larson, D.L., 2002, Native weeds and exotic plants:
relationships to disturbance in mixed-grass prairie: Plant Ecology,
v. 169 (2), p. 317-333 DOI:10.1023/A102604810307.
The effects of soil
disturbance of mixed grass prairie by prairie dogs, roads, and constructed
trails were studied in national parks in North and South Dakota.
Exotic species were more likely than native weeds to have spread
beyond the disturbed areas into native prairie. |
| |
|
| |
7. Review
articles and other resources |
| |
Boyle, S.A. and Samson, F.B., 1985, Effects of non-consumptive
recreation on wildlife: A review: Wildlife Society Bulletin, v. 13,
p. 110-116.
From 74 cited scientific articles, the authors categorized
original reports of impacts, including 91 reports on impacts related
to hiking/camping and wildlife observation/photography. Of these,
65 reports documented negative effects (16 concluded indeterminate
or no effect). |
| |
|
 |
Collinge, S.K., and others, 2004, Scientific principles
for management of City of Boulder open space lands.
For decision-makers,
this document articulates the scientific principles that may inform
policies to implement the Visitor Master Plan, summarizes consequences
of alternative actions regarding these policies, and states the relevance
of the precautionary principle. |
| |
|
| |
Montana Chapter of the Wildlife Society, 1999, Effects
of recreation on Rocky Mountain wildlife: A review for Montana.
[Highly relevant to Front Range wildlife and habitats. Each chapter
was reviewed by several experts.]
- Overview, Chapter 1
- Amphibians and reptiles, Chapter 2
- Birds, Chapter
3
- Small mammals, Chapter 4
- Semi-aquatic mammals, Chapter 5
- Ungulates,
Chapter 6
- Carnivores, Chapter 7
- Domestic dogs in wildlife habitats
Chapter 8
- Vegetation, soils, and water, Chapter 9
- Online bibliography,
Chapter 10
|
| |
|
 |
Lenth, B.E., 2006, The effects of dogs on wildlife:
Masters thesis, Fort Collins, Colorado State University. (abstract
attached) |
 |
Taylor, A.R. and Knight, R.L., 2003, Wildlife responses
to recreation and associated visitor perceptions: Ecological Applications,
v. 13(4), p. 951-963. (abstract attached). |
| |
|
 |
Fletcher, R., McKinney, S., and Bock, C., 1999, Effects
of recreational trails on wintering diurnal raptors in a Colorado grassland,
The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. Study on Boulder OSMP land.
This
study compared prairie sites with a riparian corridor, with and without
pedestrian/biker trails in the riparian corridor. In sites with no
trails, species richness, perching frequency, and abundance of raptors
was greater. Eagle abundance was strongly affected by the presence
of trails. |
| |
|
| |
Meany, C., Ruggles, A., Clippinger, N., and Lubow,
B., The impact of recreational trails and grazing on small mammals
in the Colorado piedmont (Boulder OSMP study along South Boulder
Creek)
Population density of Preble’s Meadow Jumping Mouse was 31%
lower on sites with trails than on sites without trails. |
| |
|
| |
Cole, D.N. and Schreiner, E.G.S., 1981, Impacts of backcountry
recreation: Site management and rehabilitation: U.S. Department of
Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-121. (title
page attached) |
| |
|
| |
Other |
 |
Dogs on the Trail, Even on a Leash, Give Birds a Fright |
| |
|
 |
Perceived Conflict with Off Lease Dogs at Boulder Open
Space and Mountain Parks |
| |
|
 |
Impacts of Recreation Trails o Exotic and Ruderal Species
Distribution in Grassland Areas Along the Colorado Front Range |
| |
|
 |
Habitat Fragmentation and Pollination |
| |
|
 |
Influence of Recreational Trails on Breeding Bird Communities |
| |
|
 |
Restoration Ecology to the Future: A Call for a New
Paradigm |
| |
|
 |
Relationship between Human Disturbance and Wildlife
Use in Urban Habitat Fragments |
| |
|
 |
Recommended Changes to the Trail Study Area Planning
Process for Public Review |
 |
Estimating Visitation to Boulder Open Space and Mountain
Parks |
 |
Visitor Characteristics and Beliefs about Boulder Open
Space and Mountain Parks |
| |
|
 |
What are the “novel ecosystems”
emerging along the Colorado Front Range? |
 |
Prairie dogs and dust storms: Managing novel ecosystems |
|
|
|
|